|








| |

|
Context
It is often suggested that amateur
science disappeared when science professionalised at the end of the 19th/early
20th century. However, in fields of natural history, there is a
long and in fact continuous tradition of large-scale amateur involvement.
Best known are the bird watchers, who collect large amounts of data on their
field trips, used in the assessment of biodiversity and the state of nature.
However, amateurs are also active in other many other areas of field biology
(botany, entomology, herpetology, and so on, for most larger taxonomic
branches of vertebrates and plant life). In addition, amateurs play
important roles in other fields of ‘natural history’, such as archaeology,
palaeontology, or astronomy.
The knowledge of amateur involvement
is often so developed that the term ‘amateur’ is almost seen as an insult,
suggesting that the knowledge should be inferior to professional knowledge.
That is why sometimes the term ‘avocational scientist’ is preferred, for
example in archaeology. Specialised vocational skills often involve
taxonomical knowledge, perception skills honed through long experience or
based on local knowledge, highly specialised or uniquely combined knowledge
that is not (or no longer) trained in professional settings, or the ability
to mobilise enthusiasm for labour-intensive research work.
There is some research on the role
of amateurs in field biology, and particularly on the conflicting
perceptions of nature between amateurs/conservationists and professional
biologists working in the context of conservation policies. There is also
some scarce research on amateur archaeology, but very little on other
examples of vocational science, and virtually none on comparisons between
them. Research on these topics will by necessity be exploratory, involve
data collecting through interviews and participatory observation.
Specific topics
 | Use of field data in conservation
policy |
 | Disputes over
management/ownership of such data |
 | Comparison of data
collection/management between countries |
 | International cooperation of
amateur data collection (e.g EU birding organisations) |
 | Management of shared data
infrastructures (e.g. in astronomy) |
 | Development/improvement of
instrumentation (e.g. cameras in astronomy, bat detectors in field
biology, counting/observation/indexing tools) |
 | Validation/verification tools and
practices in conservation databases |
 | Conflicts over access to sites in
Dutch archaeology |
 | Amateurs in palaeontology |
Examples of interesting questions
 | How is knowledge validated in
amateur networks? |
 | How do amateur networks develop
their own research tools (equipment, data infrastructures)? |
 | What conflicts arise between
vocational and professional knowledge production and/or government use of
this knowledge, and how is this conflict managed? |
 | How do such processes differ
between countries, between fields? |
Suitable for students who…
 | have a solid training in Science
and Technology Studies (e.g. PSTS master), history of science, or similar,
or |
 | combine basic training in social
science (qualitative methods) with a demonstrable interest in or
experience with vocational research communities, and |
 | have affinity with questions of
local knowledge, the construction of knowledge, knowledge and
professionalisation, or distributed knowledge production, or |
 | have a demonstrable interest in
conservation policy |
Opportunities
 | Access to other researchers on
this topic |
 | Possible internships combined
with this topic |
 | Potential participation in
planned future research on this topic |
Additional resources
Ellis, R., & Waterton, C. (2004).
Environmental citizenship in the
making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological
recording and biodiversity policy Science and Public Policy, 31(2),
95-105.
Lawrence, A., & Turnhout, E. (2005 NO
CITE). Personal meaning in the public space: the bureaucratisation of
biodiversity data in the Uk and the Netherlands. Paper presented at the
Royal Geographical Society, Institute of British Geographers. from
http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/humaneco/downloads/lawrenceturnhout_2005.pdf.
|
|